Visa Card Casinos UK Credit Card Casinos UK: The Real Story After the UK Credit Card Gambling Ban How the Ban Covers, “Wallet Loophole” Myths, and Consumer Safety (18+)
Visa Card Casinos UK Credit Card Casinos UK: The Real Story After the UK Credit Card Gambling Ban How the Ban Covers, “Wallet Loophole” Myths, and Consumer Safety (18+) Attention (18plus): This is an informational UK page. It does not recommend casinos, do not provide “best” lists or lists of the best casinos, and doesn’t not advocate gambling. It explains UK rules, exactly what “credit gambling” means now, what to look out for with sites that aren’t licensed and what you can do to keep yourself safe from debt risk dispute, withdrawal disputes, and fraud. Why is this phrase still used (even though “credit credit card casinos” aren’t a real UK feature) People search “credit slot casino UK” for a few common reasons: They mean debit card transactions generally and can be confused with debit with debit.. They used to play with credit card before 2020, and currently assessing whether it functions. They’re interested in finding out if PayPal or digital wallets can be funded using a credit card and used to fund gambling. They’ve come across a site that says “UK Credit cards are accepted” and are interested in knowing what the validity of this claim is. In the regulated market of Great Britain, “credit card casino” is almost utilized as a old search term since the UK implemented a gambling with credit cards prohibition that applies only to licensed operators. The UK law in plain English The licensed operators of the UK should not accept credit cards to play gambling The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) announced the ban in January 2020. It took it into effect from 14 April 2020. The UKGC’s operational guidance “Preventing credit card usage” states that the ban seeks to limit the negative effects of using borrowed funds to gamble, and includes Licence section 6.1.2 in the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP) that requires operators in certain segments not to accept credit card payments for gambling. The UKGC’s research paper on the prohibition further describes the motive to introduce “friction” for gambling borrowed funds (and provides evidence of individuals with debts that are high gambling with credit cards). Practical application: In the UKGC-licensed market, don’t expect credit cards to be an acceptable deposit method for online gambling. What’s in the ban (and the reason “digital loopholes in the wallet” generally don’t apply) Credit cards + digital wallets Businesses offering money service A common misperception is “If I fund an electronic wallet using a credit card, then I am able to utilize the wallet to play.” The UKGC report on debit and credit card wallets specifically addresses this issue and explains that allowing digital wallets to be loaded using credit cards to be used for gaming would undermine the purpose of the ban. In addition, it declares that they are satisfied digital wallets loaded with credit cards are not suitable for betting (in the context of the ban’s implementation). It also applies to purchases that are made through the money service business. A summary of the evaluation (NatCen) says that the restriction prohibits licensed companies from accepting payments made by credit card, which includes payments through a financial service business. This GREO evaluate report (PDF) is also a description of how the ban prohibits licensed entities from accepting credit card payments such as those that are processed through a money processing business. Practical lesson: In the licensed UK environment, “wallet workarounds” are not supposed to function as a method to gamble with credit. Exceptions: what is commonly removed UKGC’s appendix language (in its report of prohibition) states that the ban prohibits gamblers over the age of 18 from playing in Great Britain with a credit card. This ban is valid online as well as in-person, with an exception to purchase slots for draw tickets and scratchcards that are played face to face in retail premises. Practical lesson: The “credit card casino” concept typically does not occur unless exceptions are made; exceptions are usually specific retail lottery scenarios rather than online casino gambling. The reason the UK stopped credit card use for gambling UKGC describes the purpose as to reduce the risk of harm caused by betting with money that people don’t have. Its research publication explains the ban aimed to create friction when gambling with money borrowed. Evaluation of NatCen’s page further explains the design’s purpose as adding friction and protection to reduce gambling-related harms. The harm logic as follows: Credit cards allow for gambling with borrowed funds. It is easier to borrow money to track losses and increase debt. A ban is an effective control using friction and is not the perfect remedy but it does reduce one avenue. “Credit credit card casinos UK” currently usually refers one of these scenarios Scenario A: The user actually is referring to debit cards Many people will use “credit card” when they refer to “Visa/Mastercard” as it is a credit card.. Why it matters: debit cards differ (spending your own funds instead of borrowing money) And the UK ban is designed to limit using credit use. Scenario B: The customer stumbled upon an offshore website with no license or authorization that accepts UK credit cards If an online site claims it does accept UK cash cards for deposits at casinos It’s a very good indication you should stop and perform additional check. The UKGC’s guidelines require licensed operators not to accept credit cards to gamble. Scenario C In this scenario, the user is trying to pass through a wallet / intermediary As previously mentioned, UKGC explicitly considered the concerns about loading of wallets and assessed the implementation around digital wallets. If a website is still accepting credit cards, what signifies on UK consumer risk This article is about being aware of the risks, not “how to manage it.” When a site takes casino credit cards and advertises itself to the UK this can be associated with: Weaker UK security measures (because it could not operate in accordance with UKGC standards) Higher risk of dispute